Planim Time vs Hubstaff
Hubstaff is a manager's purchase: screenshots, activity scoring, app and URL capture, optional GPS, built-in payroll. Planim Time is the engineer's: a menu-bar timer that writes Jira worklogs and captures nothing else. Different buyers, different tools.
Manager's purchase, engineer's purchase
Where evidence-mode helps, and where it taxes the work you actually want done
Both tools end up writing Jira worklogs. One captures the path your hands took to get there; the other just captures the hours.
| Feature | Planim Time | Hubstaff |
|---|---|---|
| 01Core posture | Trust-based: timer, worklog, nothing else captured | Evidence-based: screenshots, activity rate, app and URL capture, optional GPS |
| 02Screenshots | Never | 1–3 per 10 minutes on every paid tier; optional blur; employees can delete a shot (which deletes the associated time) |
| 03Activity score | None. Your activity is your worklog | Mouse and keyboard input percentage. Reading code, reviewing PRs and meetings often register as low or idle |
| 04App and URL tracking | None | Captured while timer runs if the workspace enables it; per-user enforcement |
| 05Jira integration model | Two-way worklog sync through your personal API token, on every tier | OAuth via Jira Application Links; requires a Jira admin to set up; bidirectional, but drops seconds on write-back |
| 06Jira team-managed (next-gen) projects | Supported | Not supported. Only company-managed (classic) projects work |
| 07Jira subtasks | Supported | Not supported in the Jira integration |
| 08Worklog precision | Full duration as Jira sees it, second-precision | Seconds dropped on write-back ('Jira does not count seconds during the writeback' per Hubstaff's own docs), so totals drift over time |
| 09Jira hosting | Cloud today; Server 8.x+ and Data Center on the same flat per-seat price | Cloud and Server documented; Data Center not listed in Hubstaff's integration docs |
| 10Pricing | $0 Free, $10/mo Pro, $8/seat/mo Team (min 2 seats) | $4.99 Starter, $7.50 Grow, $10 Team, $25 Enterprise (per seat/mo, annual billing, 2-seat minimum) |
| 11Tier required for Jira integration | Free tier supports two-way Jira sync | Grow ($7.50/seat/mo annual) or higher. Starter cannot use the Jira integration |
| 12Free tier | Full Jira tracking, two-way sync, manual Push All. Free forever, no user cap | 14-day trial of Starter, then paid. No permanent free tier |
| 13GPS, geofencing, job sites | No | Yes, mobile-only; primarily Team and Enterprise |
| 14Payroll | No. Exports CSV for your accounting stack | Built-in pay rates, PayPal / Wise payouts, QuickBooks and Gusto integration on Team |
| 15Credential storage | OS keychain (Keychain, Credential Manager, Secret Service) | OAuth credentials in Hubstaff's cloud account |
| 16Background agent | Foreground app with menu-bar / tray icon; no helper process needed | Background agent for screenshot, activity, app and URL capture; auto-start on boot option |
| 17Idle detection | Idle prompt; you decide what to keep | Triggers on zero input; meetings and reading are commonly mis-flagged |
| 18Daily report | One-click copy grouped by Jira issue; CSV export | Timesheets, screenshot reels, activity reports, Insights analytics on Team and above |
| 19Compliance posture | Local SQLite, OS-keychain token; no SOC-2 listing yet | SOC-2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR; SSO and SCIM on Enterprise |
Pick by who reads the report and what they're looking for
Hubstaff's reader wants proof of attention. Planim Time's reader wants accurate hours. Choose by which question the report has to answer first.
You want hours on Jira issues, not evidence of attention.
- Your team is senior IC engineers whose day is reading code, reviewing PRs, and thinking. Hubstaff's activity score logs all three as idle
- You run a salaried in-office team where screenshot evidence of attention would be both insulting and useless
- Your Jira projects are team-managed (next-gen): Hubstaff's Jira integration explicitly excludes them, while Planim Time supports both team- and company-managed
- Your worklogs need to include subtasks: Hubstaff's Jira integration doesn't support them, Planim Time does
- Worklog totals need to match Jira to the second. Hubstaff drops seconds on write-back, so Hubstaff-side and Jira-side totals drift apart over a sprint
- You contribute to open source, freelance for multiple clients, or run a small studio where the engineer owns the timer, not the company
- Your team would push back hard on screenshots, activity rates and URL logging, and you'd rather not have that fight
- You don't want a background agent capturing app and URL events on every developer laptop just to record start and stop times
You owe a client, a manager, or a payroll system documented proof of work.
- You manage a distributed contractor workforce and your contract expects screenshots, activity rates and proof-of-work
- Your field crews (construction, cleaning, delivery, on-site service) need GPS, geofencing and automatic clock-in on arrival at a job site
- You bill clients hourly and the contract requires screenshot reels as evidence at the end of the week
- You need payroll baked in: pay rates inside the tracker, automatic payouts via PayPal or Wise, QuickBooks or Gusto integration
- Your buyer needs SOC-2 Type II, HIPAA and SSO/SCIM as a procurement checkbox
- Your industry is one where workforce monitoring is regulated and expected, not merely permitted
- You need Insights-style workforce analytics aimed at headcount management decisions
What we don't pretend Planim Time does
If your workflow needs any of these, Hubstaff is the honest pick.
- GPS, geofencing and job-site tracking. Hubstaff is built for crews moving between sites. Planim Time doesn't track location, and won't.
- Built-in payroll. Hubstaff Team closes the loop from tracked hour to paycheck via PayPal, Wise, QuickBooks and Gusto. Planim Time leaves payroll to your existing stack.
- Screenshots as a billable deliverable. Agencies that owe clients visual proof of work use Hubstaff's screenshot reel as the deliverable. We can't replicate that, and we won't.
- Enterprise compliance posture. Hubstaff Enterprise has SOC-2 Type II, HIPAA, dedicated CSM, and SSO/SCIM. Planim Time doesn't ship that surface yet, and procurement reviews where those checkboxes are mandatory will eliminate us.
- Workforce analytics dashboards. Hubstaff's Insights tier gives managers headcount-style productivity dashboards. Planim Time's team view is built for the team's own retro, not for headcount decisions.
- Mobile clock-in. Hubstaff's mobile apps let workers start and stop a shift from a phone. Planim Time is desktop-only.
- Brand presence in HR and ops procurement. Hubstaff is a default option in workforce-management RFPs. Planim Time isn't on those vendor lists yet.
Planim Time vs Hubstaff: FAQ
Does Planim Time take screenshots like Hubstaff?
How does a manager verify engineers are working without Hubstaff's activity score?
Will Hubstaff's Jira integration work with my team-managed Jira projects?
Are Hubstaff's Jira worklog totals exact?
Can I migrate Hubstaff data to Planim Time?
Is Planim Time cheaper than Hubstaff?
Does Planim Time have any employee monitoring features at all?
Will the Hubstaff agent slow my engineers' laptops?
Does Hubstaff have a permanent free tier the way Planim Time does?
Try a Jira tracker that doesn't watch the screen
Install the desktop app, paste your Jira API token, start a timer. No screenshots. No activity rate. No URL or app capture. Hours land on Jira issues through your own token. The Free tier covers a full evaluation, no credit card, no admin install.